Antikythera mechanism in Scientific American

2. December 2009 10:17

Close-up of mechanism's front dial, from reconstruction by Michael Wright

In the December issue of Scientific American there's a lengthy feature on the Antikythera mechanism by film-maker Tony Freeth, driving force behind the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. He gives some background to this 2000-year-old artefact and its significance as well as talking through his team's research on it and their results.

It's fitting that Scientific American has returned to the mechanism, as the magazine published one of the most important early articles on this ancient Greek device - written by science historian Derek de Solla Price, 50 years ago in 1959 (vol 200, no 6, pp 60-67). In the article, he laid out his theory that the battered pieces once formed part of a surprisingly sophisticated "calendar computer", calculating the movements of the Sun and Moon. He was right of course, but he didn't know the half of what it could do. It would be many years before researchers realised that the device was calculating eclipses too, and probably the epicyclic motions of the planets. Price did fully grasp its importance, however. "Nothing like this instrument is preserved elsewhere," he wrote. "On the contrary, for all we know of science and technology in the Hellenistic Age we should have felt that such a device could not exist."

While on the subject of Price's early work, I also love this quote from an article he wrote in the British science magazine Discovery, around the same time: "If it is genuine, the Antikythera machine must entail a complete re-estimation of ancient Greek technology. Its discovery 55 years ago... was as spectacular as if the opening of Tutankhamen's tomb had revealed the decayed but recognisable parts of an internal combustion engine."

Disappointingly, Freeth's latest article offers nothing new for those who have been following the subject. But it's a good opportunity to read the Antikythera story as told by one of the main protagonists. You need a subscription to access it on the Scientific American website but you can read it free here.

Tags:

Comments

12/4/2009 6:02:25 AM #

Neither of the two links leads to a free copy of Tony Freeth's article. Scientific American charges, and the other site demands that you be accessing it through either an academic service or an institutional subscription.

Parapegma Japan

2/15/2010 8:36:52 AM #

You have to pay to read about it. Which probably means it's overrated and if they didn't get your cash before reading it, they never would.

Lets face it, if it really was of academic value to future generations some philanthropist would have offered to have it displayed for free.

Paul South Africa

3/2/2010 5:35:29 AM #

We certainly don’t give ancient people as much credit as we should, in many ways. Another example which strikes me is the use of electric light bulbs in the pyramids of Egypt ... debated, I know, but certainly possible. Science has come a long way in the past hundred years, but there were some amazing developments even in ancient times.

Laser Diffraction Australia

Add comment




  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading